My Record

The work between elections

My Record

Running for Council should not be the beginning of an interest in City Hall. Since the 2022 municipal election, I have continued following decisions, reviewing public information, participating in municipal processes and answering questions from organizations that want Niagara Falls voters to know where candidates stand.

Read Where I Stand

Participation before election day

The work did not stop in 2022.

Campaign promises tell voters what a candidate hopes to do. A record shows whether that person was willing to prepare, participate and state positions before asking for the job.

Followed the Work

Attended or followed Council meetings and reviewed agendas, staff reports, budgets, policies and public decisions.

Participated Directly

Submitted correspondence, asked questions, made public presentations and used available municipal and public-review processes.

Answered Public Questions

Responded to candidate questionnaires from independent organizations so voters can compare my answers with the positions I take during the campaign.

2022–2026

A continuing record of involvement.

Municipal government affects taxes, services, development, neighbourhoods and the way residents interact with City Hall. I chose to remain involved after the last election so that my understanding would come from participation rather than from a campaign briefing.

2022

Ran for Niagara Falls City Council

After the election, I continued following municipal issues rather than treating the campaign as the end of my involvement.

2023–24

Continued learning how decisions are made

Followed Council business, reports, budgets and local issues while becoming increasingly familiar with municipal processes.

2025

Expanded direct participation

Raised concerns, submitted information and participated in processes involving public access, accountability, spending and community issues.

2026

Entered this campaign with work already behind me

Continued reviewing decisions and participating directly, while also completing independent candidate questionnaires about municipal policy and public priorities.

Candidate questionnaires & public responses

When organizations ask candidates questions, you should be able to see my answers.

During an election, media organizations, labour groups and community organizations often ask candidates to state their positions. I believe those answers should form part of the public record.

The entries below identify the organization, when I responded, what subjects were covered and the positions I submitted. These are not rewritten later to make them more convenient for the campaign.

Submitted August 19, 2026

Vote Compass — Toronto Star Partnership

Vote Compass invited candidates in the 2026 Ontario municipal election to complete a policy questionnaire and candidate profile. The initiative is being conducted in partnership with the Toronto Star.

Status: Submitted Vote Compass confirmed completion of my candidate submission on August 19, 2026.
See selected submitted positions

These are selected final responses from the questionnaire. The full public Vote Compass profile can be linked here once Vote Compass makes candidate results publicly available.

  • Niagara Falls should do more to combat climate change. Somewhat agree
  • Municipal workers are paid too much. Somewhat disagree
  • Private contractors are more efficient than municipal workers at delivering most municipal services. Somewhat disagree
  • The mayor should never overturn Council decisions. Somewhat agree
  • Municipal buildings should fly the Pride flag during Pride month. Strongly agree
  • Every Council meeting should begin with a land acknowledgement. Somewhat agree
  • Niagara Falls should keep historic street names and statues despite present-day concerns about the people commemorated. Somewhat disagree
  • Niagara Falls should impose stricter rules on short-term rentals. Somewhat disagree
  • Niagara Falls should ban residents from setting off fireworks. Somewhat disagree
Submitted August 12, 2026

Niagara Regional Labour Council

The Niagara Regional Labour Council sent candidates its 2026 Municipal Election Questionnaire as part of its political action and endorsement process.

Status: Questionnaire submitted My completed response was sent to the Niagara Regional Labour Council. This does not state or imply that an endorsement has been granted.
Read my submitted labour questionnaire answers
Previous election experience

I ran for Niagara Falls City Council in the 2022 municipal election. I have also previously run as an independent candidate for Member of Provincial Parliament and am now running again for Niagara Falls City Council.

Volunteer and community involvement

Most of my community involvement has been independent civic advocacy rather than holding a formal position in an organization. I regularly follow Niagara Falls City Council, read staff reports and municipal material, make written and oral submissions, ask questions and raise concerns when residents need a clearer explanation or fairer process.

Top five issues facing Niagara Falls

Responsible budgets and affordability: set priorities carefully, check full costs before committing, maintain essential services and avoid turning every new idea into a permanent expense.

Economic growth and the tax base: encourage investment, reliable infrastructure and reasonable approval times while requiring measurable public benefit when incentives are used.

Transparency and accountability: residents should be able to understand what Council is deciding, why it is deciding it and what it will cost.

Core services and infrastructure: emphasize maintenance, long-term planning and value for money before adding large new commitments.

Housing and community livability: support sensible housing growth while considering roads, services, neighbourhoods, public safety, green space and infrastructure capacity.

Buying local, Canadian and union-made products

Yes, where practical and permitted under purchasing rules. I support keeping municipal spending in Niagara and Canada when good quality and reasonable value are available and would consider fair labour standards and union-made products where appropriate. Procurement still has to remain transparent and accountable to taxpayers.

Contracting out public services

No, not as a general or blanket policy. A service should not be contracted out simply because private delivery is assumed to be cheaper. I would examine total costs, quality, accountability, employees and continuity of service. If a particular case demonstrably provides better value without reducing service quality, I would consider the facts.

Fair and living-wage jobs

The City and Region should create conditions in which good employers can invest and existing employers can grow: dependable infrastructure, predictable taxation, reasonable approval times, fair procurement and workforce development. Where public money is used, Council should consider the quality and durability of the jobs being created.

Trade agreements and procurement

Yes, I am aware that municipal procurement can be affected by trade agreements and purchasing rules. Before introducing a local preference or other restriction, Council should obtain current procurement and legal advice so the policy is both useful and lawful.

Economic development and good jobs

Niagara Falls should support tourism while developing a broader economic base, including trades, small businesses, manufacturing and other sectors providing steady employment. The municipality can help through reliable infrastructure, predictable rules, reasonable approvals and responsible financial management.

Artificial intelligence in municipal government

AI can assist with research, administration, data analysis and helping residents find information. It should remain a tool rather than the accountable decision-maker. Important decisions need an identifiable person responsible for checking the information and standing behind the result.

I would not support using AI as an automatic reason to eliminate jobs or remove human judgment. It should not be the sole decision-maker in hiring, discipline, termination or similar decisions. Privacy, accuracy, human review and appropriate consultation should accompany significant uses.

Working with the Niagara Regional Labour Council

Yes. I would be willing to meet with and listen to the Niagara Regional Labour Council on matters affecting workers and the community, just as I would listen to residents, businesses and other community organizations.

Would I accept a labour council endorsement?

Yes. I would appreciate an endorsement while remaining an independent candidate. An endorsement would not create an obligation to give any organization preferential treatment or prevent me from considering each issue on its own facts and in the broader public interest.

Why publish these?

These questionnaires originate with outside organizations, not with my campaign. Publishing my responses here allows residents to see whether the answers I give independently to media, labour and community organizations are consistent with the positions I present directly to Niagara Falls voters.

Selected examples

Issues I have worked on.

This is not intended to catalogue every disagreement or every communication with City Hall. These examples show the kinds of issues I have chosen to research, question and pursue.

Fiscal responsibility

Budgets and Taxpayer Value

The issue

Municipal decisions can create costs that continue for years after the initial vote.

What I did

Reviewed spending proposals, budgets and financial explanations and raised questions about costs, tax pressure, alternatives and long-term obligations.

The principle

Residents deserve to know not only what something costs today, but what they may still be paying for tomorrow.

Transparency

Casino Revenue and Public Reporting

The issue

Niagara Falls receives significant municipal revenue connected with casino operations.

What I did

Raised questions about how that revenue is reported, explained and connected to municipal spending and public benefit.

The principle

Large sources of public revenue should be understandable to the people whose city receives and spends the money.

Accountability

Public Access and Municipal Procedure

The issue

Residents should be able to understand and participate in municipal processes without unnecessary barriers.

What I did

Raised concerns involving public access, procedure, respectful treatment and transparency and used available review processes where appropriate.

The principle

Rules should protect fair process, not make public participation harder than it needs to be.

Public policy

Speed Cameras and Road Safety

The issue

Road safety matters, but enforcement programs should also be effective, proportionate and accountable.

What I did

Spoke against the City’s use of automated speed cameras and argued for careful consideration of whether the policy produces the results residents are promised.

The principle

A policy should be judged by whether it solves the problem, not simply by whether it generates activity or revenue.

Neighbourhoods

Trees and Natural Greenspace

The issue

Development decisions can permanently alter mature trees, natural areas and neighbourhood character.

What I did

Raised the importance of preserving trees and natural greenspace when municipal decisions affect neighbourhoods and future growth.

The principle

Growth is necessary, but good planning should consider what cannot easily be replaced once it is gone.

Housing

Housing and Better Use of Existing Property

The issue

Niagara Falls needs more housing while some existing buildings and properties remain underused.

What I did

Raised ideas involving housing, vacant or underused buildings and practical ways municipal policy can encourage useful investment.

The principle

Council should look for practical ways to use existing assets and encourage productive investment.

How I work

Participation should have a purpose.

Following Council is not about opposing every decision. It is about understanding what is proposed, identifying its practical effect and speaking when a question, alternative or public concern deserves attention.

1

Research: review reports, policies, budgets and governing rules.

2

Question: identify the cost, practical effect and people affected.

3

Propose: offer a question, alternative or practical improvement.

4

Follow up: record the response and acknowledge the outcome.

A record includes the outcome — not just my side of the argument.

Raising an issue does not mean Council, staff or another public body agreed with me. Where an official process reaches a different conclusion, that conclusion belongs in the record too.

The same standard applies to candidate questionnaires: an answer submitted to one organization should remain consistent with what I tell residents elsewhere.

What the record demonstrates

The habits I would bring to Council.

I do not expect voters to agree with every position I have taken. I do want them to know how I arrive at a decision and what they can expect from me if elected.

  • Read the source material before reaching a conclusion
  • Answer questions clearly even when the subject is difficult
  • Ask what a decision costs now and in future years
  • Consider the practical effect on residents and neighbourhoods
  • Use independent judgment rather than automatically following a side
  • Follow the outcome and explain it accurately

Preparation should be visible.

If you want to know what I would bring to Council, you do not have to rely only on campaign promises. Read the positions, the responses I give when others ask the questions, and the work I have already been doing.

Read Where I Stand